國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/1598
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 12145/12927 (94%)
造訪人次 : 861800      線上人數 : 784
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於NHRI ‧ 管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/1598


    題名: The dimensions of responsiveness of a health system: a Taiwanese perspective
    作者: Hsu, CC;Chen, LW;Hu, YW;Yip, WN;Shu, CC
    貢獻者: Center for Health Policy Research and Development
    摘要: Background: Responsiveness is an indicator used to measure how well a health system performs relative to non-health aspects. This study assessed whether seven dimensions proposed by the World Health Organization ( WHO) to measure responsiveness ( dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, prompt attention, social support, basic amenities, and choices of providers) are applicable in evaluating the health system of Taiwan. Methods: A key informant survey and focus group research were used in this study. The translated WHO proposed questionnaire was sent to 205 nominated key informants by mail, and 132 (64.4%) were returned. We used principal component analysis to extract factors. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the total score and the extracted factors. A qualitative content analysis was also carried out in focus group research. Results: Principal component analysis produced five factors ( respect, access, confidentiality, basic amenities, and social support) that explained 63.5% of the total variances. These five factors demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and four of them ( except social support) were significantly correlated with the total responsiveness score. The focus group interviews revealed health providers' communication ability and medical ethics were also highly appraised by Taiwanese. Conclusion: When the performance of a health system is to be evaluated, elements of responsiveness proposed by WHO may have to be tailored to fit different cultural backgrounds. Four key features illustrate the uniqueness of Taiwanese perspectives: the idea of autonomy may not be conceptualized, prompt attention and choice of providers are on the same track, social support during care is trivially correlated to the total responsiveness score, and accountability of health providers is deemed essential to a health system.
    關鍵詞: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
    日期: 2006-03-17
    關聯: BMC Public Health. 2006 Mar;6:Article number 72.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-72
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1471-2458&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000237427800001
    Cited Times(Scopus): http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646566508
    顯示於類別:[陳麗光] 期刊論文
    [許志成] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    000237427800001.pdf240KbAdobe PDF600檢視/開啟


    在NHRI中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋