國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/1598
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 12145/12927 (94%)
造访人次 : 859607      在线人数 : 701
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于NHRI管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/1598


    题名: The dimensions of responsiveness of a health system: a Taiwanese perspective
    作者: Hsu, CC;Chen, LW;Hu, YW;Yip, WN;Shu, CC
    贡献者: Center for Health Policy Research and Development
    摘要: Background: Responsiveness is an indicator used to measure how well a health system performs relative to non-health aspects. This study assessed whether seven dimensions proposed by the World Health Organization ( WHO) to measure responsiveness ( dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, prompt attention, social support, basic amenities, and choices of providers) are applicable in evaluating the health system of Taiwan. Methods: A key informant survey and focus group research were used in this study. The translated WHO proposed questionnaire was sent to 205 nominated key informants by mail, and 132 (64.4%) were returned. We used principal component analysis to extract factors. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the total score and the extracted factors. A qualitative content analysis was also carried out in focus group research. Results: Principal component analysis produced five factors ( respect, access, confidentiality, basic amenities, and social support) that explained 63.5% of the total variances. These five factors demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and four of them ( except social support) were significantly correlated with the total responsiveness score. The focus group interviews revealed health providers' communication ability and medical ethics were also highly appraised by Taiwanese. Conclusion: When the performance of a health system is to be evaluated, elements of responsiveness proposed by WHO may have to be tailored to fit different cultural backgrounds. Four key features illustrate the uniqueness of Taiwanese perspectives: the idea of autonomy may not be conceptualized, prompt attention and choice of providers are on the same track, social support during care is trivially correlated to the total responsiveness score, and accountability of health providers is deemed essential to a health system.
    关键词: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
    日期: 2006-03-17
    關聯: BMC Public Health. 2006 Mar;6:Article number 72.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-72
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1471-2458&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000237427800001
    Cited Times(Scopus): http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646566508
    显示于类别:[陳麗光] 期刊論文
    [許志成] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    000237427800001.pdf240KbAdobe PDF600检视/开启


    在NHRI中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈