國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/9958
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 917164      Online Users : 1485
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/9958


    Title: Effects of nal-IRI (MM-398) +/- 5-fluorouracil on quality of life (QoL) in NAPOLI-1: A phase 3 study in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) previously treated with gemcitabine
    Authors: Hubner, R;Cubillo, A;Blanc, JF;Melisi, D;Von Hoff, D;Wang-Gillam, A;Chen, LT;Becker, C;Mamlouk, K;Belanger, B;Yang, Y;De Jong, F;Siveke, J
    Contributors: National Institute of Cancer Research
    Abstract: Introduction: Patients with mPDAC frequently experience a significant symptom burden. This in turn negatively impacts their QoL. Nal-IRI, a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, was evaluated with or without 5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in a randomized phase 3 study in patients with mPDAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1). Results showed nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV significantly improved overall survival compared with 5-FU/LV (6.1 vs 4.2 months; unstratified hazard ratio 0.67; P = 0.012) (Wang-Gillam et al., Lancet. 2016). QoL was a secondary endpoint of the study.Methods: QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life core questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), which includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); symptom scales (appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, insomnia, nausea and vomiting, and pain); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Patients were to complete the questionnaire at treatment start, every 6 weeks, and 30 days post-follow-up visit. The population analyzed included all patients who provided baseline and at ≥1 subsequent EORTC-QLQ-C30 assessment. Linear transformations were applied to the raw scores to produce reported scores in the 0-100 range. In the responder analysis, patients were classified as improved (≥10% increase in scale of breadth at a post-baseline time point and remained above baseline for ≥6 weeks), worsened (did not meet improvement criteria and died, or had ≥10% decrease from baseline in scale of breadth at a post-baseline time point), or stable (did not meet criteria for improvement or worsening) for each subscale. Pairwise treatment group comparisons on response classification were performed for each subscale using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel testing adjusted for multiplicity with a Benjamini-Hochberg correction to control false discovery rate at 0.05 level for the 15 comparisons.Results: A total of 154 patients (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV, n = 71; 5-FU/LV, n = 83) comprised the population for this analysis of which 69% (49/71) of patients in the nal-IRI + 5-FU group and 53% (44/83) in the 5-FU/LV group had evaluable data at 12 weeks. At baseline, median Global Health Status scores were near the midpoint of the scoring range, median Functional Scale scores were high, and Symptom Scale scores were low, with baseline values similar between groups. The observed median change in score at 12 weeks was 0 for both treatment groups for Global Health Status and for the following subscale scores: role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, social functioning, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. For subscale scores for which the median change was not 0 (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV: physical functioning and fatigue), the between-group differences were not substantial. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients classified as improved, worsened, or stable between the treatment groups. Across subscales, adjusted P values for the comparisons were >0.05 (NS).Conclusion: In NAPOLI-1, evaluable nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV-treated patients with data through 12 weeks tended to maintain baseline QoL over 12 weeks, and there were no significant differences versus the 5-FU/LV-treated patients in QoL response despite the addition of a second cytotoxic agent. These results are limited by the small number of patients and variability in QoL subscale scores.
    Date: 2016-06
    Relation: Annals of Oncology. 2016 Jun;27(Suppl. 2):119.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw198.04
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0923-7534&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000379756200387
    Appears in Collections:[Li-Tzong Chen] Conference Papers/Meeting Abstract

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    ISI000379756200387.pdf40KbAdobe PDF287View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback