國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/9928
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 856849      Online Users : 939
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    NHRI > NHRI Graduate Student Program > Others > Periodical Articles >  Item 3990099045/9928


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/9928


    Title: Reoperation rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical degenerative diseases: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan
    Authors: Lin, JH;Chien, LN;Tsai, WL;Chen, LY;Hsieh, YC;Chiang, YH
    Contributors: Graduate Student Program
    Abstract: BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The reoperation (reop) rate is a crucial indicator of the efficacy of an operation; however, studies on the reop rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior laminoplasty (LMP) for treating multilevel cervical degenerative diseases (MCDDs) are scant. PURPOSE: To compare the reop rates and safety of ACDF and LMP for MCDD treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective population-based cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent ACDF and LMP treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reop rate, risk of pneumonia, sepsis, surgery-related complications, and death. METHODS: 6605 patients who underwent ACDF and 1578 patients who underwent LMP for MCDD treatment from 2001 to 2011 were selected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to compare the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent ACDF with those of the patients who underwent LMP. RESULTS: Long-term reop rates (per 100 person-month) was slightly higher in the patients who underwent ACDF (0.04 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.03-0.05]) than those who underwent LMP (0.06 [95% CI: 0.04-0.08]), with adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.43 (95% CI, 0.96-2.11, P=0.08) although short-term reop rates were significantly higher in the LMP group (0.41 [95% CI: 0.33-0.51]) than in the ACDF group (0.09 [95% CI: 0.07-0.11]), with adjusted HR of 4.81(95% CI, 3.46-6.69, P<0.001). Patients who underwent LMP had a lower risk of pneumonia, sepsis, surgery-related complications, and death than did those who underwent ACDF within a year of follow-up. The results after adjustment for all covariates showed that osteoarthritis (adjusted HR = 2.07, 95% CI, 1.40-3.06, P<0.01) was associated with reop risk in the patients who underwent ACDF, and diabetes (adjusted HR = 3.27, 95% CI, 1.12-9.54, P=0.03) was associated with reop risk in the patients who underwent LMP. CONCLUSION: There was no significantly higher incidence rate of reop between the patients who underwent LMP and those who underwent ACDF after 1-year follow-up; however, ACDF was associated with a higher rate of 1-year complications and mortality compared with LMP. LMP might be considered as a treatment option for MCDD but could not appropriate for patients with cervical kyphotic deformity.
    Date: 2016-12
    Relation: Spine Journal. 2016 Dec;16(12):1428-1436.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.017
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1529-9430&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000394875800003
    Cited Times(Scopus): http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84994514625
    Appears in Collections:[Others] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    PUB27520080.pdf1097KbAdobe PDF304View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback