English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 911695      Online Users : 967
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/9857


    Title: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of three screening tools for insomnia
    Authors: Chiu, HY;Chang, LY;Hsieh, YJ;Tsai, PS
    Contributors: Division of Health Services and Preventive Medicine
    Abstract: AbstractBackground Insomnia is a highly prevalent health complaint in the modern societies; however, insomnia remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. Although screening tools, including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), are widely used for assessing the risk of insomnia, the diagnostic properties have yet to be summarized in a systematic manner. Objectives To estimate and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the ISI, AIS, and PSQI for insomnia screening. Data sources We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Chinese Electronic Periodic Services for data from their inception to May 20, 2015. Data selection Original articles that had assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the ISI, AIS, or PSQI against a reference standard in adult participants (age > 18) were included. Results A total of 19 studies comprising 4693 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity for the ISI, AIS, and PSQI was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 0.93), 91% (0.87 to 0.93), and 94% (0.86 to 0.98), respectively. The pooled specificity was 85% (0.68 to 0.94), 87% (0.68 to 0.95), and 76% (0.64 to 0.85); and the pooled DORs was 41.93 (8.77 to 200.33), 67.7 (23.4 to 196.1), and 53 (15.5 to 186.2), respectively. The summary estimates did not differ significantly among the ISI, AIS and PSQI (all P > 0.05). Conclusions The current evidence indicates that the ISI, AIS, and PSQI yield comparable diagnostic properties for insomnia screening.
    Date: 2016-08
    Relation: Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2016 Aug;87:85-92.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.06.010
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0022-3999&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000380297300012
    Cited Times(Scopus): http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84976601102
    Appears in Collections:[其他] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    SDO0022399916303324.pdf1011KbAdobe PDF362View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback