國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/9360
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 914095      Online Users : 1298
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/9360


    Title: Is noninvasive brachial systolic blood pressure an accurate estimate of central aortic systolic blood pressure?
    Authors: Shih, YT;Cheng, HM;Sung, SH;Chuang, SY;Hu, WC;Chen, CH
    Contributors: Division of Health Services and Preventive Medicine
    Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Noninvasive brachial systolic blood pressure (nSBP-B) usually approaches invasive central systolic blood pressure (iSBP-C) with a high correlation. Whether nSBP-B is an accurate estimate of iSBP-C remained to be investigated. Thus, this study aimed to compare the errors of nSBP-B and noninvasive central systolic blood pressure (nSBP-C) with different techniques in estimating iSBP-C. METHODS: Simultaneous invasive high-fidelity central aortic pressure waveforms and the noninvasive left brachial pulse volume recording (PVR) waveform were recorded in a Generation group (N = 40) and a Validation group (N = 100). The accuracy of the noninvasive estimates of iSBP-C obtained from analysis of the calibrated PVR waveform using the generalized transfer function (GTF), pulse waveform analysis (PWA), and N-point moving average (NPMA) methods was examined in the Validation group by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE). RESULTS: In Generation group, the MAE was 4.6+/-4.1mm Hg between nSBP-B and invasive brachial SBP, and 6.8+/-5.5mm Hg between nSBP-B and iSBP-C. In comparison, the MAE of between iSBP-C and nSBP-C with PWA, NPMA, and GTF were 5.5+/-4.5, 5.8+/-4.9, and 5.9+/-5.0mm Hg, respectively. In Validation group, the MAE of nSBP-B (6.9+/-4.6mm Hg) for estimating iSBP-C was significantly greater than that of PWA (5.0+/-3.4mm Hg) and NPMA (6.1+/-4.4mm Hg), and GTF (6.1+/-4.9mm Hg). The percentage of absolute band error </=5mm Hg was 62% for nSBP-B, 69% for GTF, 83% for PWA, and 69% for NPMA. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of nSBP-B was inferior to the n SBP-C measures in estimating iSBP-C.
    Date: 2016-11
    Relation: American Journal of Hypertension. 2016 Nov;29(11):1283-1291.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpv164
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0895-7061&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000387967000011
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84995489137
    Appears in Collections:[Shao-Yuan Chuang] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    PUB26437666.pdf694KbAdobe PDF466View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback