English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 851705      Online Users : 1009
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/6852


    Title: The effect evaluation of the postgraduate training program of systematic reviews
    Authors: Weng, YH;Shih, YH;Lo, HL;Kuo, KN;Chen, CF;Chiu, YW
    Contributors: Division of Health Services and Preventive Medicine
    Abstract: Background: Systematic reviews provide critical exploration, evaluation, and synthesis of the unmanageable amount of information and separate the insignificant, unsound, or redundant deadwood in the medical literature from the salient and critical studies that are worthy of reflection. They have been regarded as the highest quality of evidence for clinical practice. Objectives: The National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan provided a series of education for postgraduate health professionals to learn systematic reviews. The curricula of the two-day workshop include how to perform meta-analysis by using RevMan 5. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of this training program. Methods: A pre- and post-survey of participants was carried out to examine views related to systematic reviews including changes in beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills, and perceived barriers. Results: The professions of participants include physicians, nurses, pharmacists, nutritionists, and public health experts. After educational training, participants’ knowledge and skill in the systematic reviews significantly increase (p < 0.001). They are more likely to believe that systematic reviews can improve patient care quality (p < 0.001), and thus to support the implementation of the systematic reviews (p < 0.001). The prevalence of perceived barriers to produce systematic reviews also decline (p < 0.001). In addition, the most common barrier to meta-analysis is lacking English language skill. Conclusions: The belief, attitude, knowledge, and skill in relation to systematic reviews have been improved after the training program. These data suggest that education is useful in disseminating systematic reviews.
    Date: 2011-10
    Relation: The 19th Cochrane Colloquium. 2011 Oct. 19-22.
    Link to: http://2011.colloquium.cochrane.org/es/abstracts/effect-evaluation-postgraduate-training-program-systematic-reviews
    Appears in Collections:[邱亞文(2005-2013)] 會議論文/會議摘要
    [郭耿南(2003-2010)] 會議論文/會議摘要

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback