國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/6712
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 12145/12927 (94%)
造訪人次 : 924996      線上人數 : 945
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於NHRI ‧ 管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/6712


    題名: Compatibility of AGREE and clinical experts review in guideline appraisal
    作者: Kuo, KN;Lo, HL;Chen, C
    貢獻者: Division of Health Services and Preventive Medicine
    摘要: BACKGROUND (INTRODUCTION):AGREE is the most accepted instrument in appraising the methodological quality of clinical practice guideline (CPG). Six domains measure different aspects of CPG quality and may differ from clinical expert perspective. LEARNING OBJECTIVES (TRAINING GOALS):1. To compare the result and compatibility of CPG appraisal between AGREE measures and clinical expert perspective. 2. To identify the inconsistent criteria in order to improve the consensus between AGREE reviewers and clinical specialty. METHODS:We collected data from independent evaluation by AGREE and related clinical expert on 17 CPGs developed from 2007 to 2008. For “strongly recommended” rating, we gave a score 3, “recommended with alteration” 2, and “not recommended” 1. The differences between AGREE and clinical expert's scores were expressed as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predict value in relative intra- and inter-AGREE domains. RESULTS:Nine out of 17 CPGs showed similar recommendation between AGREE and clinical expert ratings. Four domains of AGREE were particularly sensitive to clinical expert perspective, including stakeholder involvement (sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.75, PPV 0.80, NPV 0.86), rigor of development (0.89, 1.0, 1.0, 0.89), clarity and presentation (0.78, 0.88, 0.88, 0.78), and editorial independence (0.78, 1.0, 1.0, 0.80). The result is the same if we calculated those four sensitive AGREE domains and omitting other two. In consistency of items within each domain, the majority of items under “rigor of development,” “clarity and presentation,” and “editorial independence” showed relative high coherence. However, the consistency varied within ‘stakeholder involvement' domain.DISCUSSION (CONCLUSION):Our finding points out the compatibility between AGREE and clinical expert appraisal in CPG quality, and the predictability between the two. It is crucial to improve reviewer's training for enhancing inconsistent domains of AGREE.
    日期: 2010-07
    關聯: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2010 Jul;143(1, Suppl. 1):22.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2010.04.146
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0194-5998&DestApp=IC2JCR
    顯示於類別:[郭耿南(2003-2010)] 會議論文/會議摘要

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    SDO2012082229.pdf80KbAdobe PDF660檢視/開啟


    在NHRI中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋