國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/5073
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 12145/12927 (94%)
造访人次 : 907037      在线人数 : 831
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于NHRI ‧ 管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/5073


    题名: Phase II randomized trial of erlotinib versus vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) aged >= 70 years in Taiwan
    其它题名: N
    作者: Chen, Y;Tsai, C;Shih, J;Perng, R;Whang-Peng, J
    贡献者: National Institute of Cancer Research
    摘要: Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, such as erlotinib, are effective against NSCLC, especially in East Asian patients. Single-agent chemotherapy, such as vinorelbine, is an appropriate treatment choice for elderly patients. Oral vinorelbine is more convenient for elderly patients than intravenous vinorelbine. The primary objective of this study was to compare the response rate of chemo-naïve, elderly patients with advanced NSCLC treated with daily erlotinib versus oral vinorelbine. Methods: Chemo-naïve Taiwanese patients aged ≥70 years with advanced NSCLC were enrolled and randomized (stratified by histology, smoking status, ECOG performance status, and gender) to receive either oral erlotinib 150mg/day or oral vinorelbine (60mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle and subsequently increased to 80mg/m2 every 3 weeks in the absence of grade 2 adverse events). From February 2007 to July 2008, 116 patients were enrolled. Results: By October 2008, 77 enrolled patients (n = 37 for erlotinib; n = 40 for vinorelbine) had completed 6 cycles of study treatment and were available for efficacy and safety analyses. Objective response rates were 21.6% (8/37) with erlotinib and 12.8% (5/39) with vinorelbine [95% CI -0.09–0.24 for the difference in response rate between arms]. Disease control rate was 70.3% with erlotinib and 56.4% with vinorelbine [95% CI -0.09–0.34 for the difference in disease control rate between arms; p = 0.216). Median time to disease progression was 4.4 months [95% CI 4.1–5.4] with erlotinib, compared with 3.9 months [95% CI 2.4–6.9] with vinorelbine, p = 0.6069. The most common treatment-related toxicities were skin rash and diarrhea with erlotinib, and diarrhea and nausea with vinorelbine. Conclusions: Erlotinib is effective and well tolerated compared with oral vinorelbine in elderly, chemo-naïve, Taiwanese patients with NSCLC. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented.
    日期: 2009-05-20
    關聯: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009 May 20;27(15s):Abstract number 8051.
    Link to: http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/27/15S/8051
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0732-183X&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000276606605253
    显示于类别:[彭汪嘉康(1996-2007)] 會議論文/會議摘要

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在NHRI中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈