English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 848771      Online Users : 1309
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/4705


    Title: The diffusion of new drug in Taiwan medical care under national health insurance: The case of Cox2
    Authors: Tsai, YW;Huang, WF;Wen, YW;Chen, PF
    Contributors: Division of Health Policy Research and Development
    Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Adoption of new drug in medical care, a highly-regulated industry, is and essential in terms of access to newtreatment option and raise on health care expenditure. Thisstudy, using Cox2 as example, is to examine the diffusion of newdrug among hospitals of different characteristics. METHOD:The data were drawn from systematic random sample of NHIclaim data in 1997 to 2001. We applied the Bass diffusion modelto analyze the monthly number of each hospital’s outpatientclinic visits with COX2. Bass diffusion model based on the initialtime of purchase of product to explains the behavior of the dif-fusion of the product in the market: length to reach maximummonthly volume, maximum monthly volume, growth rate.RESULTS: The estimates of Bass diffusion model shows that themonthly numbers of outpatient clinic visits with COX2 pre-scription reached the stable maximum in the 92th month, 41months after the introduction of COX2 on April of 2001. Thelength of growth period for reaching maximum volume variedwith different accreditation level of hospital: academic medicalcenter 38 months, metropolitan hospitals 43 months, local com-munity hospitals 40 months, and physician clinics 51 months.The average of maximum volume for academic center was 76.17outpatient visits, metropolitan hospitals 87.25 visits, local com-munity hospitals 62.65 visits, and physician clinics 34.38 visits.Physician clinics has the fast growth rate (q = 0.1278), in con-trast to the slowest of local community hospitals (q = 0.1159),CONCLUSION: Hospitals of different level vary in terms ofadopting new drugs. Academic medical centers play the role ofinnovators.
    Date: 2006-11
    Relation: Value in Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;9(6):A382.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1098-3015(10)63760-6
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1098-3015&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000240922000613
    Appears in Collections:[蔡憶文(1999-2010)] 會議論文/會議摘要

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    ISI000240922000613.pdf58KbAdobe PDF633View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback