English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 905573      Online Users : 272
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/15734


    Title: Evaluating the efficacy of OralDETECT training: Face-to-face versus online delivery in dental education
    Authors: Ramanathan, A;Zaini, ZM;Ghani, WMN;Wong, GR;Zainuddin, NI;Yang, YH;Zain, RB
    Contributors: National Institute of Cancer Research
    Abstract: Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of face-to-face (F2F) and online OralDETECT training programme in enhancing early detection skills for oral cancer. Methods: A total of 328 final-year dental students were trained across six cohorts. Three cohorts (175 students) received F2F training from the academic years 2016/2017 to 2018/2019, and the remaining three (153 students) underwent online training during the Covid-19 pandemic from 2019/2020 to 2021/2022. Participant scores were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, the Mann-Whitney test, Cohen's d effect size, and multiple linear regression. Results: Both F2F and online training showed increases in mean scores from pre-test to post-test 3: from 67.66 +/- 11.81 to 92.06 +/- 5.27 and 75.89 +/- 11.03 to 90.95 +/- 5.22, respectively. Comparison between F2F and online methods revealed significant differences in mean scores with large effect sizes at the pre-test stage (p < 0.001), while significant differences with small effect sizes were noted for post-test 1 (p = 0.002) and post-test 3 (p = 0.041). Regression analysis indicated that the delivery method is associated with the participants' final scores. Conclusion: F2F and online versions of the OralDETECT training programme significantly enhance participants' knowledge and skills in oral cancer detection. Although F2F appeared to be more effective, the difference was not substantial enough to be considered educationally meaningful.
    Date: 2024-03-15
    Relation: Oral Diseases. 2024 Mar 15;Article in Press.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.14927
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1354-523X&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188293606
    Appears in Collections:[楊奕馨] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    ISI001185466300001.pdf682KbAdobe PDF48View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback