國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/14174
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 12145/12927 (94%)
造訪人次 : 860777      線上人數 : 900
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於NHRI ‧ 管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/14174


    題名: Does ultrasound education improve anatomy learning? Effects of the Parallel Ultrasound Hands-on (PUSH) undergraduate medicine course
    作者: Chen, WT;Kang, YN;Wang, TC;Lin, CW;Cheng, CY;Suk, FM;Hsu, CW;Huang, SK;Huang, WC
    貢獻者: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
    摘要: BACKGROUND: As ultrasound has become increasingly prominent in medicine, portable ultrasound is perceived as the visual stethoscope of the twenty-first century. Many studies have shown that exposing preclinical students to ultrasound training can increase their motivation and ultrasound competency. However, few studies have discussed the effect of ultrasound training on anatomy learning. METHOD: The Parallel Ultrasound Hands-on (PUSH) course was designed to investigate whether or not ultrasonography training affects anatomy knowledge acquisition. The PUSH course included anatomical structures located in the chest and abdomen (target anatomy) and was conducted in parallel to the compulsory gross anatomy course. Learners (n = 140) voluntarily participated in this elective course (learners in the course before the midterm examination (Group 1, n = 69), or after the midterm examination (Group 2, n = 71)). Anatomy examination scores (written and laboratory tests) were utilized to compare the effects of the PUSH course. RESULT: Group 1 obtained significantly higher written test scores on the midterm examination (mean difference [MD] = 1.5(7.6%), P = 0.014, Cohen's d = 0.43). There was no significant difference in the final examination scores between the two groups (Written Test: MD = 0.3(1.6%), P = 0.472). In Laboratory test, both mid-term (MD:0.7(2.8%), P = 0.308) and final examination (MD:0.3(1.5%), P = 0.592) showed no significant difference between two groups. Students provided positive feedback in overall learning self-efficacy after the PUSH course (Mean = 3.68, SD = ±0.56 on a 5-point Likert scale). Learning self-efficacy in the cognitive domain was significantly higher than that in the affective domain (MD = 0.58; P < 0.001) and psychomotor domain (MD = 0.12; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The PUSH course featured a hands-on learning design that empowered medical students to improve their anatomy learning.
    日期: 2022-03-27
    關聯: BMC Medical Education. 2022 Mar 27;22:Article number 207.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03255-4
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1472-6920&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000773955700001
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127260431
    顯示於類別:[黃嘯谷] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    PUB35346161.pdf1097KbAdobe PDF225檢視/開啟


    在NHRI中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋