國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/13614
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 12145/12927 (94%)
造访人次 : 908862      在线人数 : 1034
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于NHRI ‧ 管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/13614


    题名: Anatomical Phase Extraction (APE) method: A novel method to correct detrimental effects of tissue-inhomogeneity in referenceless MR thermometry-preliminary ex vivo investigation
    作者: Huang, CFJ;Lin, WL;Hwang, SC;Yao, C;Chang, H;Kuo, LW
    贡献者: Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Nanomedicine
    摘要: Purpose. We present a novel background tissue phase removing method, called anatomical phase extraction (APE), and to investigate the accuracy of temperature estimation and capability of reducing background artifacts compared with the conventional referenceless methods. Methods. Susceptibility variance was acquired by subtracting pretreatment baseline images taken at different locations (nine pretreatment baselines are acquired and called phi(1) to phi(9)). The susceptibility phase data phi(S) was obtained using the Wiener deconvolution algorithm. The background phase data phi(T) was isolated by subtracting phi(S) from the whole phase data. Finally, phi(T) was subtracted from the whole phase data before applying the referenceless method. As a proof of concept, the proposed APE method was performed on ex vivo pork tenderloin and compared with other two referenceless temperature estimation approaches, including reweighted l1 referenceless (RW- l1) and l2 referenceless methods. The proposed APE method was performed with four different baselines combination, namely, (phi(1), phi(5), phi(2), phi(4)), (phi(3), phi(5), phi(2), phi(6)), (phi(7), phi(5), phi(8), phi(4)), and (phi(9), phi(5), phi(8), phi(6)), and called APE experiment 1 to 4, respectively. The multibaseline method was used as a standard reference. The mean absolute error (MAE) and two-sample t-test analysis in temperature estimation of three regions of interest (ROI) between the multibaseline method and the other three methods, i.e., APE, RW- l1, and l2, were calculated and compared. Results. Our results show that the mean temperature errors of the APE method-experiment 1, APE method-experiment 2, APE method-experiment 3, APE method-experiment 4, and RW- l1 and l2 referenceless method are 1.02 degrees C, 1.04 degrees C, 1.00 degrees C, 1.00 degrees C, 4.75 degrees C, and 13.65 degrees C, respectively. The MAEs of the RW- l1 and l2 referenceless methods were higher than that of APE method. The APE method showed no significant difference (p>0.05), compared with the multibaseline method. Conclusion. The present work demonstrates the use of the APE method on referenceless MR thermometry to improve the accuracy of temperature estimation during MRI guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for ablation treatment.
    日期: 2021-08-11
    關聯: Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2021 Aug 11;2021:Article number 5566775.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5566775
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000687436500002
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113821371
    显示于类别:[郭立威] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    ISI000687436500002.pdf2079KbAdobe PDF167检视/开启


    在NHRI中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈