國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/13086
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 922499      Online Users : 1296
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/13086


    Title: Comparison of spatial modelling approaches on PM(10) and NO(2) concentration variations: A case study in Surabaya City, Indonesia
    Authors: Widya, LK;Hsu, CY;Lee, HY;Jaelani, LM;Lung, SC;Su, HJ;Wu, CD
    Contributors: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
    Abstract: Because of fast-paced industrialization, urbanization, and population growth in Indonesia, there are serious health issues in the country resulting from air pollution. This study uses geospatial modelling technologies, namely land-use regression (LUR), geographically weighted regression (GWR), and geographic and temporal weighted regression (GTWR) models, to assess variations in particulate matter (PM(10)) and nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)) concentrations in Surabaya City, Indonesia. This is the first study to implement spatiotemporal variability of air pollution concentrations in Surabaya City, Indonesia. To develop the prediction models, air pollution data collected from seven monitoring stations from 2010 to 2018 were used as dependent variables, while land-use/land cover allocations within a 250 m to 5000 m circular buffer range surrounding the monitoring stations were collected as independent variables. A supervised stepwise variable selection procedure was applied to identify the important predictor variables for developing the LUR, GWR, and GTWR models. The developed models of LUR, GWR, and GTWR accounted for 49%, 50%, and 51% of PM(10) variations and 46%, 47%, and 48% of NO(2) variations, respectively. The GTWR model performed better (R(2) = 0.51 for PM(10) and 0.48 for NO(2)) than the other two models (R(2) = 0.49-0.50 for PM(10) and 0.46-0.47 for NO(2)), LUR and GWR. In the PM(10) model four predictor variables, public facility, industry and warehousing, paddy field, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), were selected during the variable selection procedure. Meanwhile, paddy field, residential area, rainfall, and temperature played important roles in explaining NO(2) variations. Because of biomass burning issues in South Asia, the paddy field, which has a positive correlation with PM(10) and NO(2), was selected as a predictor. By using long-term monitoring data to establish prediction models, this model may better depict PM(10) and NO(2) concentration variations within areas across Asia.
    Date: 2020-11-29
    Relation: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 Nov 29;17(23):Article number 8883.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238883
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000597460100001
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097036147
    Appears in Collections:[Others] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    PUB33260391.pdf5892KbAdobe PDF114View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback