國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/12759
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 12274/13174 (93%)
造访人次 : 1759444      在线人数 : 157
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于NHRI管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/12759


    题名: Survival impacts of different nodal characteristics and T-classification in N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
    作者: Lin, TY;Lan, MY;Tsou, HH;Ho, CY;Twu, CW;Liu, YC;Lin, PJ;Huang, PI;Shiau, CY;Lin, JC
    贡献者: Institute of Population Health Sciences
    摘要: Objectives: We investigated the survival impacts of various nodal characteristics and T-classification on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with the 8th AJCC/UICC staging criteria N3. Materials and methods: Pretreatment MRIs from 110 staged N3 NPC patients were reviewed. There were 23 T1, 25 T2, 32 T3, and 30 T4, respectively. All except one patient belonged to WHO type II pathology. All patients received curative radiotherapy 68.0–76.8 Gy plus different chemotherapy, including induction, concurrent, adjuvant or any combination. Various endpoints, including OS (overall survival), DFS (disease-free survival), LRFFS (locoregional failure-free survival), DMFFS (distant metastasis failure-free survival) were compared between different nodal characteristics and T-classification. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in all analyzed survival curves between various nodal characteristics, including unilateral N3 vs. bilateral N3, “large” nodes (>6 cm) alone vs. “low” nodes (below the caudal border of cricoid cartilage) alone vs. combined “large” and “low” nodes, risk score 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4 (by counting the sum of “large” and “low” nodes in the same case), and radiologic extra-nodal extension. Patients with T4, compared with those of T1-3 have worse OS (5-year rates, 42.2% vs. 82.8%, P < 0.0001), DFS (5-year rates, 43.9% vs. 68.9%, P = 0.0037), LRFFS (5-year rates, 69.3% vs. 82.7%, P = 0.0432), and DMFFS (5-year rates, 57.2% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.0163). Conclusions: Our results support merging previous N3a and N3b as a N3 category in the 8th edition new staging system. Patients with T4N3 diseases have extremely poor outcome and deserve to strengthen the treatment intensity in future trials.
    日期: 2020-09
    關聯: Oral Oncology. 2020 Sep;108:Article number 104820.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104820
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1368-8375&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000566724700015
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086118381
    显示于类别:[鄒小蕙] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    SCP85086118381.pdf3351KbAdobe PDF401检视/开启


    在NHRI中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈