English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 851546      Online Users : 881
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/12585


    Title: Comparison of geospatial-temporal modeling approaches in air pollution estimations
    Authors: Zeng, YT;Wu, CD;Chen, YC;Hsu, CY;Chen, MJ
    Contributors: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
    Abstract: Recent advancements in the geographic information systems and remote sensing technology have supported the development of geospatial-temporal modeling approaches for air pollution. Particulate matter (PM10) and ozone (O3) are two pollutants of great concern in all pollutants. Previous studies estimated the spatial-temporal variability of PM10 and O3 using a single model, but only a few studies considered exposure assessment using multiple models and compared model performance. In this study, PM10 and O3 data during 2015 to 2018 were collected from specific industrial monitoring stations provided by the Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency. Three geospatial-temporal modeling approaches including land-use regression (LUR), geographically weighted regression (GWR), and geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) were used to predict PM10 and O3 exposure. Furthermore, the kriging-based hybrid model was integrated with these three geospatial-temporal models, and totally performs six models for each pollutant for our comparison. The results showed that integrating the GTWR and kriging-based hybrid models have the greatest performances compared to LUR, GWR, and the combination of both with kriging-based hybrid models. R2 obtained from the GTWR coupled with kriging-based hybrid models for PM10 and O3 was 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Of all variables used, wind speed, pure residential area, manufacturing, park; rice field, orchard; and forest land were important predictors for PM10. Whereas, wind direction, industrial area, dry farming, and orchard were variables selected to predict O3.
    Date: 2019-10
    Relation: 40th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, ACRS 2019. 2019 Oct:2342.
    Link to: http://www.proceedings.com/52891.html
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105833040
    Appears in Collections:[陳裕政] 會議論文/會議摘要

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback