English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 852301      Online Users : 1513
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/12515


    Title: Effects of Epstein-Barr virus viral load and different treatment modality for stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Authors: Twu, CW;Wang, WY;Tsou, HH;Liu, YC;Jiang, RS;Liang, KL;Lin, PJ;Lin, TY;Chen, HH;Lin, JC
    Contributors: Institute of Population Health Sciences
    Abstract: Background We investigated treatment results, the effects of different treatment modality, and pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load for stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Methods The initial definitive treatment for 356 stage III NPC patients consisted of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (IndCT-RT). The pretreatment EBV DNA level separated patients into a high (n = 106) or low (n = 250) viral load (>= or < 1000 copies/mL) subgroup. Outcome measures include relapse rates and various survivals. Results The 5-year rates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis failure-free survival (DMFFS), and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) were 88.6%, 83.0%, 90.5%, and 90.5%, respectively. Patient characteristics and pretreatment viral load between IndCT-RT and CCRT were no significant differences except for a higher percentage of N2 disease in the IndCT-RT subgroup. Both treatment modality resulted in similar relapse rates (P = .56), OS (P = .20), PFS (P = .53), DMFFS (P = .89), and LRFFS (P = .35). However, patients with a high viral load experienced a higher relapse rate (33.0% vs 12.4%, P < .001) and worse OS (5-year rate, 79.0% vs 92.8%, P < .001), PFS (73.7% vs 88.4%, P < .001), DMFFS (80.2% vs 95.0%, P < .001), and LRFFS (85.6% vs 92.6%, P = .005) than those with a low viral load. Conclusion Long-term treatment results for stage III NPC patients are rather good. IndCT-RT can achieve the same treatment outcome as CCRT. Risk grouping by pretreatment viral load identified a subgroup (30%) of patients associated with a significantly higher relapse rates and worse survivals. These high-risk patients need to strengthen treatment intensity in future trials.
    Date: 2020-08
    Relation: Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 2020 Aug;42(8):1765-1774.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26096
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1043-3074&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000510496800001
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078914256
    Appears in Collections:[鄒小蕙] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    ISI000510496800001.pdf1486KbAdobe PDF282View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback