國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/10497
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 12190/12972 (94%)
造訪人次 : 1062506      線上人數 : 793
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於NHRI ‧ 管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/10497


    題名: Roles of ramR and tet(A) mutations in conferring tigecycline resistance in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates
    作者: Chiu, SK;Huang, LY;Chen, H;Tsai, YK;Liou, CH;Lin, JC;Siu, LK;Chang, FY;Yeh, KM
    貢獻者: Division of Infectious Diseases
    摘要: Tigecycline is regarded as a last-resort treatment for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections, but increasing numbers of tigecycline-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates have been reported. Tigecycline resistance mechanisms are underdetermined in CRKP. This study aimed to elucidate mechanisms underlying tigecycline resistance in 16 tigecycline- and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (TCRKP) isolates. Mutations in tigecycline resistance determinant genes (ramR, acrR, oqxR, tet(A), tet(L), tet(X), tet(M), rpsJ) were assessed by PCR amplicon sequencing, and mutations in ramR and tet(A) exhibited high prevalences individually (81%) and in combination (63%). Eight functional ramR mutation profiles reducing tigecycline sensitivity were verified by plasmid complementation of wild-type and mutant ramR Using a site-specific mutant, the most frequent RamR mutation, A19V (60%), had no significant effect on tigecycline susceptibility and upregulation of ramA and acrA Two tet(A) variants with double frameshift mutations, Type 1 and Type 2, were identified; Type 2 tet(A) is novel. Parent strain transformed with a plasmid carrying Type 1 or Type 2 tet(A) increased tigecycline MIC by 8-fold or 4-fold, respectively. Synergistic effects were observed in strains harboring deficient ramR and mutated tet(A), with an 8-fold increase in tigecycline MIC compared with strains harboring only mutated tet(A). Overall, mutations in the ramR and tet(A) efflux genes constituted the major tigecycline resistance mechanisms among the studied TCRKP isolates. The identification of strains exhibiting the combination of deficient ramR and widespread mutated tet(A) is concerning due to the possible dissemination of increased tigecycline resistance in K. pneumoniae.
    日期: 2017-08
    關聯: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2017 Aug;61(8):Article number e00391-17.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00391-17
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0066-4804&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000406259400043
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026376056
    顯示於類別:[蕭樑基] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    PUB28533243.pdf219KbAdobe PDF342檢視/開啟


    在NHRI中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋